Date of Origination: 11/15/95 Collected by: Paul Martin Last modification: 11/15/95 by PSM Description: This study is a replication and extension of an experiment conducted in Minneapolis to test the efficacy of three types of police response to spouse abuse. Three experimental treatments were employed: (1) advising and possibly separating the couple, (2) issuing a citation (an order to appear in court to answer specific charges) to the offender, and (3) arresting the offender. The mail focus of the project concerned whether arrest is the most effective law enforcement response for deterring recidivism of spouse abusers Source: Hirschel, J. David, et al. CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA SPOUSE ASSAULT REPLICATION PROJECT, 1987-1989 [Computer file]. Compiled by J. David Hirschel et al., University of North Carolina at Charlotte. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter- university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1994. ICPSR study 6114 Number of observations: 324 Variables: There are 21 variables in the data file. v1 "victims age" v2 "victims race" 1 asian 2 black 3 white 4 hispanic 5 other v3 "victim suspect relationship" 1 married 2 separated 3 divorced 4 cohabitant 5 ex cohabitant v4 "victim suspect residence" 1 living together 2 living apart v5 "actual assignment" 1 advise separate 2 citation 3 arrest v6 "offender hit slap hurt victim" 1 yes 2 no v7 offender damaged property" 1 yes 2 no v8 "offender threw something at victim 1 yes 2 no v9 times arrested for abuse assault v10 since primary incident offender actually hit victim 1 yes 2 no v11 n days after primary incident first hit v12 # days from primary incident to interim v13 hist # 6mo actually hit victim v14 hist # total actually hit victim v15 # times police called in last 6mo 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 or more v16 # times police called since known 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 or more v17 relationship at 6 month 1 married 2 divorced 3 separated 4 cohabiting 5 ex-cohabitants v18 since first interview offender actually hit victim 1 yes 2 no v19 since first interview #times victem hit by offender 1 2 3 4 5 5 or more v20 #wks after first interview first hit v21 #wks past first interview most recent hit First three observations from datafile: 21 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 . 2 . . . 0 1 1 1 1 2 . . . 32 2 4 1 1 1 2 2 . 2 . . . 4 15 1 1 5 2 . . . 27 2 4 1 3 1 2 1 . 2 . . . 0 0 1 1 5 1 1 40 . Last three observations from datafile: 29 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 . . . 0 3 0 3 1 2 . . . 43 3 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 2 . . . 1 2 0 0 4 2 . . . 17 2 1 1 3 1 2 2 . 2 . . . 1 1 1 1 1 2 . . .