The Voters’ Side of the Story

PS 426

February 28 and March 4

 

Differences in constituencies

lCentral tendencies and heterogeneity.  Members of Congress will campaign differently depending on their district.

lFenno’s concentric circles: personal, primary, reelection, and geographic.  Members of Congress have to pay attention to different parts of their constituency in different ways.

lImpact on representation – may be very different depending on the MC’s campaigning style.

 

Turnout

lBasic patterns.  Comparative evidence.

lInvestment theory of voting–nobody would vote.  Anything that raises the benefits or lowers the cost should increase turnout.  Voter registration, government employees, differences between candidates, education and income, mobility.  Close elections?  Rational abstention.

lConsumption theory of voting:  The “D” term.  People vote for various reasons.

lDoes low turnout matter?  Ideology, attitudes toward the political system, impact on the outcome (higher turnout better for challengers).

 

Figure -- Turnout in Presidential and Con-gressional Elections, 1896-2004

 

Figure -- Corrected voter turnout

 

Why people vote as they do

lIdeology – vote for candidate closest to your ideological position (89% for Rs and 85% for Ds).  Convergence of candidates doesn’t happen that much.  Project Vote Smart survey.

lParty Identification.  Importance for helping shape political behavior and attitudes.  Impact on voting.  Rise of independents.    

lIssue voting.  "Issue ownership" and the Democrats and Republicans.

lPersonal characteristics and voter contact.  “Likes and dislikes.”

lDemographic factors.  Race, gender, income and voting.

 

Figure -- The Decline in Party Identification, 1952-2004

 

Figure -- 2004 Presidential Vote by Race and Gender

 

Figure -- 2004 Presidential Vote by Income

 

Midterm loss for the President’s party

lSurge and decline and “withdrawn coattails.” 

lIdeological/partisan balancing – not much evidence for this, but it does happen to some extent.

lPresidential coattails – aggregate level and individual level contradiction.  Broader policy significance – why does it matter whether presidents have coattails in Congress or not?

 

Incumbency advantage

lHow to measure: success rate, vanishing marginals, sophomore surge (about 7%), retirement slump,  Slurge.”    Recall and recognition.

lFactors explaining incumbency advantage.

Compositional – shift in the distribution of partisan strength in the electorate.  More independents, fewer partisans.  Independents more likely to vote for incumbents.  This counts for roughly 1/3 of the change.

Behavioral – changes in the behavior of House members that lead to more electoral success (casework, money, contact with voters (going home every weekend),  weak challengers, campaign finance.

lIncrease in the volatility of incumbent votes

 

Figure -- Turnover and Percent Defeated:  U.S. House, 1948-2004

 

Figure -- Percent Defeated and Turnover:  U.S. Senate, 1948-2004